
Case 01
Customer service.
The typical situation
In most mid-market companies we meet, customer service is left to itself. No contact codes to classify requests, no response templates, no written processes. Agents improvise, quality varies by person, handle times climb. A 20-agent team spends 60-70% of its time on repetitive tier-1 requests it has already handled a thousand times.
Our intervention
We start with an operational audit: request types, volumes, real SLAs, friction points. We install contact codes, write processes, produce the templates that didn't exist. Then we install the AI layer — automated ticketing via n8n connected to your helpdesk, LLM qualification of each incoming ticket, auto-response on tier-1 grounded in your validated processes and templates, smart escalation to a human agent — themselves LLM-assisted — on complex cases.
The outcome
40-60% deflection on tier-1 requests. First-response SLA divided by three. CSAT maintained or improved (consistent processes = less perceived variability). The 20-person team can drop to 10-12 agents, refocused on tier-2 and tier-3 — what they were hired for. Quality and productivity KPIs in place, audited monthly.
Return on investment
8–12×
Year-1 ROI
- Starting point: a 20-agent service, loaded cost ~€45k/year, payroll ~€900k.
- Effect: 40–60% deflection on tier-1 tickets — 8 to 10 FTEs freed, recurring savings of €360–450k/year.
- Cost: Aure-lab engagement of €35–45k, diagnostic + implementation included.
- Payback in under two months. The remaining team, refocused on tier-2 and tier-3, works better.
- Engagement
- €35–45k
- Recurring savings
- €360–450k/yr
- Payback
- ≈ 2 months
Range calibrated for a 15 to 30-agent team. Absolute gain scales with the size of the existing team.


